Humanize From Discovery Institute's Center on Human Exceptionalism
Category

Animal Welfare

two-macaques-in-close-proximity-to-each-other-against-a-back-881724141-stockpack-adobe_stock
two macaques in close proximity to each other against a background of green vegetation, AI, wild nature monkeys
Image Credit: makentosha - Adobe Stock

PETA Sues NIH for Violating Its “First Amendment Right” to Talk to Monkeys

Animal rights activists keep attempting to grant “rights” to animals through novel — and I would say, frivolous — lawsuits. PETA sued SeaWorld, claiming that the orcas were “slaves.” The Nonhuman Rights Project has sued three times to have chimpanzees and elephants declared “persons” entitled to writs of habeas corpus. Those suits failed. But animal rights activists never give up. Now, PETA is suing the NIH and the National Institute of Mental Health, claiming that the agency’s refusal to allow them to receive closed-circuit monitoring of research monkeys and communicate directly with them violates the animal rights fanatics’ First and Fifth Amendment rights. The irrationality begins in the complaint’s first and second paragraphs when the complaint alleges PETA has a Read More ›

elephant-in-zoo-stockpack-adobe-stock-275497968-stockpack-adobe_stock
elephant in zoo
Image Credit: Mary - Adobe Stock

Colorado Supremes Unanimously Nix Elephant Personhood

Animal rights activists are determined to persuade a court to declare an animal a “person” to enable them to engage in unremitting lawfare against all animal uses — an advocacy project known as “animal standing.” Having failed twice in New York to have chimps and then an elephant named Happy declared persons, the NonHuman Rights Project moved its effort to Colorado seeking writs of habeas corpus to be issued on behalf of zoo elephants. The activists had some reason for hope. Two judges in New York’s highest court swallowed the baloney in a 5-2 ruling against elephant personhood. Thankfully, the Colorado supreme court exhibited greater wisdom in unanimously turning the case away. Why? Because as any ten-year-old could tell the Read More ›

cute-piglet-portrait-in-veterinarian-hands-close-up-eyes-of-156430412-stockpack-adobe_stock
Cute piglet portrait in veterinarian hands, Close up eyes of swine in the farm. Hugging a pig.
Image Credit: krumanop - Adobe Stock

Pig-to-Human Kidney Transplant Offers Hope — and an Ethical Solution

With so many people on the organ transplant waiting list, the ethics of organ donation have begun to buckle. These proposals are not only unethical, in my opinion; in some cases they also treat donors as objects rather than subjects. Each and any of them could undermine the public’s already thin trust in the organ transplant system, which would be a catastrophe. But an ethical way forward has also been researched assiduously, and it is beginning to bear fruit: xenotransplantation, that is, the use of pigs’ organs, genetically altered to be more compatible with humans. Early experiments offer cause for optimism. Recently, a woman who was dying of kidney failure received a pig kidney, and she seems to be doing well. Read More ›

indoors-chicken-farm-chicken-feeding-stockpack-adobe-stock-234942101-stockpack-adobe_stock
Indoors chicken farm, chicken feeding
Image Credit: davit85 - Adobe Stock

NYT Column: Factory Farms Are Good for People and the Planet

We hear a lot from environmentalists, animal rights activists, and just plain caring people about the supposed evils of industrial farming. Neo-Luddites throw tantrums about GMOs, for example. And many commenters — including in these pages — lament the conditions in which meat animals and egg-laying hens are raised. Those are certainly legitimate concerns worthy of investigation and debate. But we also need to focus on the tremendous good humans receive from having bountiful, affordable, and nutritious food supplies, which would seem to require at least some industrial methods to achieve. Indeed, until now, these and other benefits humans receive from industrial agriculture and so-called factory farms seem to be one of those hot potato topics that we are not allowed to Read More ›

humpback-whale-underwater-in-caribbean-stockpack-adobe-stock-204555192-stockpack-adobe_stock
Humpback whale underwater in Caribbean
Image Credit: willtu - Adobe Stock

Now, It’s “Whale Rights”

The “nature rights” project — and its ancillaries — keeps advancing, mostly ignored by those who could stop it in its tracks with legislation declaring that only humans and our associations and juridical entities have legal standing in courts or enforceable rights. Now, a “whale rights” project has commenced, pushed pro bono by a big international law firm, Simmons and Simmons. From the Legal Cheek story: These frameworks centre on the concept of a “legal person” — an entity acknowledged as having “standing” within the judicial system. Traditionally, this status has been reserved for humans, community organisations, and corporations. Granting this designation to whales represents a groundbreaking shift, acknowledging the value of non-human life and redefining how the law engages Read More ›

elephant-lawyer-in-a-courtroom-an-imposing-figure-in-a-tailo-790952637-stockpack-adobe_stock
Elephant lawyer in a courtroom an imposing figure in a tailored suit presenting a case
Image Credit: Sara_P - Adobe Stock

Will Colorado Allow Elephants to Sue?

Animal-rights activists never quit. The Nonhuman Rights Project, having lost cases seeking writs of habeas corpus for chimpanzees and an elephant named "Happy" in New York, has now brought a case in Colorado. It was properly tossed out of court at the trial-court level. Read More ›
one-cute-pig-curious-on-the-camera-stockpack-adobe-stock
One cute pig curious on the camera
Image Credit: talsen - Adobe Stock

Saving Humans Is More Important Than Saving Pigs

The chronic shortage of organs for transplantation has some bioethicists supporting unethical curatives, such as doing away with the dead-donor rule, allowing organ procurement to be not only paired with euthanasia — already being done in Canada, Belgium, and the Netherlands — but also used as a means of euthanasia, and even allowing healthy people to consent to donating their vital organs. Read More ›
elephant-in-the-savannah-in-namibia-africa-concept-for-traveling-in-africa-and-safari-stockpack-adobe-stock
Elephant in the savannah, in Namibia, Africa, concept for traveling in Africa and Safari
Image Credit: Tiago Fernandez - Adobe Stock

Court Rules Elephant Does Not Have Rights

I have written here several times about the attempt by the Nonhuman Rights Project (NHRP) to “break the species barrier” by having animals declared “persons” entitled to enforceable rights. The first cases involved chimps. The latest attempt involved Happy the elephant, a denizen of the Bronx Zoo. Read More ›
elephant-in-the-savannah-in-namibia-africa-concept-for-traveling-in-africa-and-safari-stockpack-adobe-stock
Elephant in the savannah, in Namibia, Africa, concept for traveling in Africa and Safari
Image Credit: Tiago Fernandez - Adobe Stock

Why Happy the Elephant Should Not Have Rights

Promoting the proper care of animals is a noble cause. But that is not what the legal effort to have Happy declared a ‘person’ is ultimately all about. Read More ›