Humanize From Discovery Institute's Center on Human Exceptionalism
Topic

bioethics

newborn-baby-in-hospital-stockpack-adobe-stock-172829774-stockpack-adobestock
Newborn Baby in Hospital
Image Credit: Cari - Adobe Stock

CRISPR Saves a Baby’s Life

Biotechnology is like Star Wars’, “Force”: It has a dark side and a light side. CRISPR, the gene-editing technique that can alter any cell and life-form on the planet, exemplifies the point. It can be deployed to alter a bird flu virus to kill multitudes. It can be used for eugenics manipulations. And, in theory, it can save the lives of people afflicted with genetic diseases. That seems to have just happened. Baby KJ’s life was apparently saved or extended — at least for now — using the technique to treat a genetically caused liver condition. From the Stat story: For the first time, scientists say they have reached into the genome of a severely ill child and rewritten the Read More ›

backlit-silhouettes-of-a-diverse-group-of-individuals-raisin-733774184-stockpack-adobestock
Backlit silhouettes of a diverse group of individuals raising their fists in solidarity against an urban skyline at sunset.
Image Credit: WARAPHON - Adobe Stock

Bioethics Is Becoming Just Another Social-Justice Political Movement

The field of bioethics was established to work through the proper parameters of medical ethics and to grapple with the vexing public health policy questions that arose in an increasingly technological age. The field’s primary (but not only) contribution to the public good (in my opinion) came early, through the work of the late theologian Paul Ramsey. In his seminal work, The Patient as a Person, Ramsey argued that forcing patients to be hooked up to “machines” against their will treated them as less than equals. The resulting bioethical discourse resulted in the legal right we all have to informed consent and to refuse unwanted medical treatment, even if that could lead to our deaths. Alas, in the decades since Ramsey’s heyday, Read More ›

healthcare-comfort-and-hands-of-doctor-and-patient-for-conso-963233360-stockpack-adobestock
Healthcare comfort and hands of doctor and patient for consoling empathy and support for diagnosis results Hospital clinic and health worker embrace person for medical care service and : Generative AI
Image Credit: The Little Hut - Adobe Stock

A Compassionate Doctor Keeps Hope Alive

“Futile care” is a bioethics theory in which doctors are authorized to refuse wanted life-sustaining treatment based on their belief about the quality of a patient’s life. It can be cruel — and on occasion, mistaken. Prominent medical journals usually support futile-care theory. But the New England Journal of Medicine just published a contrary column by a compassionate doctor who rejected that approach in order to keep hope alive for his terminally ill patient and her family. The oncologist, Dr. David N. Korones, placed a young terminally ill cancer patient named Zoha in an experimental drug trial. At first all seemed well, then her condition worsened. From, “The Last Dose”: Although the rules of the trial allowed Zoha to remain Read More ›

an-ambulance-with-lights-activated-and-a-police-car-behind-i-985580048-stockpack-adobe_stock
An ambulance with lights activated and a police car behind it in an urban environment
Image Credit: F Armstrong Photo - Adobe Stock

Bioethics Think Tank: Defy ICE!

The American people voted for President Trump, in large part, because they want immigration law to be enforced across all of society. But many bioethicists think that health-care institutions should be uncooperative. The Hastings Center is a core offender. It has just published its second major call in two months urging hospitals to defy ICE whenever legally possible. Read More ›
a-medical-professional-closely-monitoring-a-patients-vital-s-832178746-stockpack-adobe_stock
A medical professional closely monitoring a patient's vital signs on advanced medical equipment in a hospital setting. The image highlights the precision and care involved in patient monitoring.
Image Credit: Phatharaporn - Adobe Stock

Bioethicists Get Legacy of Terri Schiavo Death Wrong

Twenty years ago today, Terri Schiavo’s feeding tube was withdrawn with court approval, commencing a cruel deprivation of sustenance that resulted in her death by dehydration 13 days later. For those who may not remember, the case became the most hotly contested bioethics issue since Roe v. Wade as Terri’s husband Michael fought in courts and in the media with her parents and siblings over his desire to remove all Terri’s food and fluids. In the end, he won — and Terri died. Now, two bioethicists on the influential Hastings Center blog decry the case as wrongly brought. They get some facts wrong and omit crucial information — like that Michael was living with another woman with whom he fathered Read More ›

Screenshot 2025-03-13 100810

Wesley J. Smith Talks Human Exceptionalism on Family First New Zealand

Wesley J. Smith joined host Simon O’Connor on Family Matters, a show from Family First New Zealand, to discuss human exceptionalism. Together, they discuss what makes humans different from animals, the problem with mainstream bioethics today, why euthanasia is wrong, and more!

us-immigration-and-customs-enforcement-ice-with-police-going-1243199274-stockpack-adobe_stock
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) with police going to homes suspected of housing illegal immigrants during raids to detain and arrest foreign nationals who entered US illegally. Concept.
Image Credit: Sweeann - Adobe Stock

Bioethicist Urges Hospitals to Defy ICE

Mainstream bioethics discourse is often just progressive politics by a higher-brow name. Now, the Hastings Center — the world’s most influential bioethics think tank — has published an advocacy essay by Loyola University bioethicist Mark G. Kuczewski, who urges his colleagues to convince hospital administrators to thwart the attempts of Immigration and Customs Enforcement to arrest illegal aliens at their institutions. Kuczewski laments the “fear” that the enforcement of immigration law is supposedly instilling in “immigrant communities,” somehow forgetting to note that whom he is really discussing are not immigrants in general but those here illegally. From “Supporting Patients and Students Who Are Immigrants: What to Do and Why Most Bioethicists Won’t Do It”: A devastating wave of fear now permeates immigrant communities. The rhetoric Read More ›

doctor-holding-a-globe-in-hands-representing-global-healthca-942796667-stockpack-adobe_stock
Doctor holding a globe in hands, representing global healthcare, medicine, and medical care services, emphasizing world health preservation.
Image Credit: Boontharika - Adobe Stock

Only Bioethicists Can Prevent Global Warming

The bioethics movement has always had power ambitions beyond wrestling with health policy and medical ethics. Indeed, for years, the mainstreamers have been seeking to interpose themselves into the global-warming controversy.

The Hastings Center — the beating heart of the bioethics establishment — has been leading the charge to so expand the sector’s influence. The center just published a call to arms to fight global warming by a medical ethics professor emeritus, advocating that bioethicists be at the center of the climate-change fray.

After praising the inflation-causing spending of the mendaciously named Inflation Reduction Act as now set in stone — time will tell — the author rallies the bioethicists troops to the great cause. From “Now What? Bioethics and Mitigating Climate Disasters“:

We might well ask: Now what? Is there a way to make a difference over the next four years? And, especially, does bioethics have a role in this effort?

I argue that there is important work ahead and bioethics should be squarely in the middle of it. The work is less in federal policy and more in public persuasion. The role for bioethics is to bring global warming and its catastrophic health consequences into focus as an existential crisis neither party can ignore.

Read More ›
Screenshot 2024-11-13 102307

Wesley J. Smith Appears on American Thought Leaders to Discuss the Assisted Suicide Movement

Wesley J. Smith was on EpochTV’s American Thought Leaders this week in an episode dedicated to exploring the history and dangers of the assisted suicide movement. From EpochTV: “When a country or a state legalizes assisted suicide or euthanasia, it can no longer call itself anti-suicide, because it specifically approves some suicides. … It’s a very dangerous movement that is normalizing this kind of approach to dying as opposed to natural death.” In this episode, I sit down with Wesley J. Smith, a lawyer, public speaker, award-winning author, and chair of the Discovery Institute Center on Human Exceptionalism. “We’re seeing in Canada also the beginning of a situation where patients who have a tough time getting an oncologist because of Read More ›

scientist-holding-a-lab-mouse-evaluating-her-condition-prior-553581829-stockpack-adobe_stock
Scientist holding a lab mouse, evaluating her condition prior to running some tests and inoculation the animal with a virus
Image Credit: lightpoet - Adobe Stock

We Can’t Let “Experts” Decide the Morality of Making “Humanized Animals”

Bioethics is a utilitarianish social-political movement whose primary advocates are usually philosophers, lawyers, and/or doctors. Mainstream bioethicists (unless they have a modifier in front of the identifier, such as “Catholic”) generally push against human exceptionalism — a concept many view as “speciesism” — and promote Tower of Babel–like experiments that push us toward an almost-anything-goes research ethic. Bioethical issues are generally debated beyond the public’s perception, in professional journals, before they are introduced in public policy. The Journal of Medical Ethics, published out of Oxford, is one of the movement’s most influential publications. A major new article therein discusses the ethical implications of scientists’ implanting human-brain “organoids” — functional brain tissue created with stem cells — into animals, which could enhance Read More ›