is-embryo-adoption-actually-surrogacy-fr-tad-pacholczyk-bioe
Humanize From Discovery Institute's Center on Human Exceptionalism
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Is Embryo Adoption Actually Surrogacy? The Catholic Case Against It with Fr. Tad Pacholczyk

Originally published at Bioethics Babe
Categories
Bioethics

What if saving a human life could itself be morally wrong?

More than 1.5 million human embryos are estimated to be frozen in the United States, many abandoned by the parents who created them through in vitro fertilization (IVF).

For some, the solution seems obvious: Why not adopt these embryos, give them a chance to be born, and welcome them into loving families?

But is embryo adoption an act of mercy, or another form of surrogacy?

In Part 2 of Bioethics Babe’s Frozen Embryo Series, Fr. Tad Pacholczyk makes the Catholic moral and theological case against embryo adoption, responding directly to the philosophical and theological arguments in its defense.

Fr. Tad served for more than 22 years as an ethicist, Director of Education, and Senior Ethicist at the National Catholic Bioethics Center.

We discuss:

  • Why Fr. Tad argues that embryo adoption is a form of surrogacy
  • Whether procreation ends at fertilization or continues through pregnancy and birth
  • What Dignitas Personae and Donum Vitae teach about embryo adoption
  • Whether the Catholic Church has definitively settled the debate
  • Fr. Tad’s responses to the philosophical and theological arguments for embryo adoption
  • Whether embryo transfer constitutes therapeutic, life-saving medical care
  • The moral risks of thawing and transferring frozen embryos
  • Whether artificial womb technology could provide an ethical alternative
  • The heartbreaking question of what should happen to embryos left in cryopreservation

If destroying frozen embryos is wrong, leaving them frozen indefinitely is troubling, and embryo adoption is morally impermissible, what are we supposed to do?

This is Part 2 of a series presenting competing Catholic bioethical perspectives, following Dr. Melissa Moschella’s philosophical case for embryo adoption in Part 1.

Regardless of how a child is conceived or born, every human being possesses equal and inherent dignity.

For the latest episodes, episode resources, and general resources, please visit www.bioethicsbabe.com.

Please subscribe to my YouTube page:  https://www.youtube.com/@BioethicsBabe

Thank you for tuning in!
XOXO,
Bioethics Babe

Follow BB on social media:
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@BioethicsBabe
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61576554667052
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bioethicsbabe
X: https://x.com/bioethicsbabe

Listen to BB on Your Favorite Podcast Platform:
Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/bioethics-babe/id1841776855
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0sk6pK4vYfvkdyQh3vVO5m
Amazon/Audible: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/168b2504-9269-4910-b3da-6e0b954da9de/bioethics-babe
iHeart: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-bioethics-babe-296039682/
RSS: https://rss.com/podcasts/bioethicsbabe/

Arina Grossu Agnew

Fellow, Center on Human Exceptionalism
Arina Grossu Agnew is a Fellow with Discovery Institute’s Center on Human Exceptionalism. Arina focuses on human dignity, human rights, and the sanctity of human life from fertilization to natural death. Arina’s areas of expertise include abortion, women’s health, bioethics, conscience, pornography, sex trafficking, assisted suicide, and euthanasia. Arina is the founder and principal at Areté Global Consulting where she works on policy, bioethics, communications, and strategic partnerships.