


Science Journals Have Become Intensely Political
I have related here on several occasions how intensely political supposedly objective science and medical journals have become. The New England Journal of Medicine pushes progressive politics all of the time, as just one example. So does Science, which for example, has endorsed the “nature rights” movement. Nature joined the crowd too in publishing an hysterical jeremiad against President Trump by Jeff Tollefson, its D.C.-based reporter. But if you read the lengthy attack, its most bitter complaints are about intensely believed political and policy differences, not actual examples of Trump being somehow “anti-science.” For example, construes every Trump action on COVID in the most negative light possible. He also attacks Trump’s immigration policy. From, “How Trump Damaged Science–and Why It Could Take Decades to Recover”: Trump has also eroded Read More ›

World Animal Day and Human Exceptionalism

Vatican: No Sacraments for People Choosing Euthanasia

Assisted Suicide is Never a Treatment for Mental Illness

Pope Supports Classifying ‘Ecocide’ as an International Crime

Using Bonobos to Bash Human Exceptionalism

Animal Testing Discovers New Antibody Component for Fight Against COVID

Autonomy or Abandoning the Mentally Ill?
