hospice

Discovery Institute Senior Fellow and Chair of the Center for Human Exceptionalism Wesley J. Smith was quoted in the following article, “What’s Happened to Hospice?”, originally published at National Catholic Register. The following is an excerpt. We encourage readers to go to National Catholic Register to read the full piece.

Many Catholic families can testify to the positive experiences they’ve had with hospice programs that cared for loved ones in their final days with dignity and compassion.

But recent news reports about rampant fraud have cast hospice in a different light. In June, for example, federal authorities charged the operator of multiple Los Angeles hospice businesses, along with a group of alleged accomplices, with a $27-million fraud scheme that involved stealing the identities of dead people and billing the government for phony healthcare services, using the proceeds to pay for luxury items including lease payments on a Rolls-Royce Phantom sedan that costs more than $500,000.

“Can you imagine anything more low than to pretend you’re taking care of dying people when you’re not?” said Wesley J. Smith, chair and senior fellow at the Center on Human Exceptionalism, a bioethics and public policy program of the Seattle-based Discovery Institute that focuses on issues of human dignity, liberty and equality.

Hospice leaders and other experts say the flood of such hospice scandals is symptomatic of a profit-driven mindset that has taken hold in what is now a $31-billion-a-year industry, moving hospice farther and farther away from its roots as a Christian work of mercy predicated on the fundamental dignity of human life.

“I’m a big supporter of good hospice care,” Smith said. “But I’m worried about the direction hospice is going.”

Assisted suicide legalization is bad medicine and even worse public policy. It abandons the sick, destroys human equality by creating a killable caste of people, and cheapens the intrinsic dignity of human life. Moreover, the supposed “strict safeguards” are neither strict — for example, relying on doctor self-reporting — nor particularly protective. Besides, as soon as the law goes into place, the safeguards are quickly redefined as “obstacles” to a good death and the process of loosening the law commences.

These and other myriad problems have gotten the attention of Senators James Lankford (R., Okla.) and Tim Kaine (D., Va.), who along with two representatives sent a letter to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. asking for oversight over the practice in the hospice context. Among their expressed concerns (citations omitted):

• “There are grave informed consent issues within physician-assisted suicide. Patients spend little time with the physician providing physician-assisted suicide relative to the course of their disease.”

The modern hospice movement is one of the great humanitarian advances of the last hundred years. The story began shortly after World War II, when a young, devout Anglican medical social worker named Cicely Saunders befriended a Jewish émigré named David Tasma. Tasma had escaped the Warsaw Ghetto only to be dying at age 40 in a London hospital. He was alone in the world, and Saunders made a special point to visit with him every day. Their friendship changed how we medically treat—and perhaps even more importantly, perceive—people who are dying. I was honored to interview Dame Cicely (as she is affectionately known in the United Kingdom) in 1998 while researching my book Culture of Death. In reflecting on her Read More ›

The future that some of us predicted about assisted suicide deployed as a resource saver has come to the U.K. Even as the House of Commons has passed a legalization bill — currently being debated in the House of Lords — the country’s hospice system is collapsing. From the BBC story:

Some 380 hospice beds out of around 2,000 lie empty in England because of financial pressures, say bosses.

Hospice UK has told BBC News this is up from 300 a year ago and illustrates the severe challenges facing the sector.

Beds are left empty to save money — since staffing and caring is costly — and so are unavailable to patients.

Do you know what isn’t costly? Assisted suicide. Poison is cheap.

I understand that people are terrified of dementia. Believe me, I get it. My mother died of Alzheimer’s. But I can’t wrap my head around the fact that advocacy for killing/suicide as the answer to the difficulties caused by the condition is becoming ubiquitous. Noted bioethicist and lawyer Thaddeus Mason Pope has written an essay, to be published in an edited volume, on this very issue. It lists eleven ways people can “avoid late-stage dementia,” and almost all involve intentionally ending life. Remember when we were told that advance medical directives are the key to not receiving life-extending treatment one does not want? They are, but that’s not good enough for Pope, because it doesn’t guarantee death: This strategy is Read More ›

As established by the great medical humanitarian, the late Dame Cecily Saunders, hospice was designed to treat “total pain” of patients — whether physical, emotional, or spiritual — to the end of ensuring that the care offered is about living, not just death. When it works as intended, as it did for both my parents, the beneficence offered to patients and their families cannot be quantified.

Alas, the hospice movement is in serious trouble. I can’t tell you how often now people approach me after a speech or call in on talk radio to tell me that they do not trust hospice to properly care for their loved ones.

Why has this happened? My friend Ira Byock, the great palliative doctor and author of Dying Well, has noted that the for-profit sector of the industry too often does not live up to the hospice promise of profoundly personal and compassionate care. Also, there is a problem with fraud and abuse, about which, Byock insists, there must be institutional “zero tolerance.” In addition, the integration of palliative care within the American health system has stalled, despite demonstrating that quality care for seriously ill and dying people is both feasible and affordable.

And from my perspective — not Byock’s — the assisted suicide movement has been a body blow to the hospice movement. Partly this is because the media is so besotted with “aid in dying” propaganda that there is little room left to tell good hospice stories. But I also blame institutional hospice organizations, which pretend that assisted suicide isn’t a mortal threat to the hospice philosophy. As a consequence of this institutional cowardice, all one hears from hospice organizations about legalizing assisted suicide is the proverbial sound of silence, further diminishing the importance of the sector.

Yesterday, I posted about a Vermont bill that would allow nondoctors to prescribe death. I found out today that Oregon has similar legislation pending that would allow “providers” to lethally prescribe. SB 1003 specifies that “provider” can mean a licensed physician, a licensed physician assistant, or a licensed nurse practitioner. I wouldn’t trust a PA or NP to diagnose me with six months to live. Would you? That is not a putdown. These valuable medical professionals’ primary roles are to provide generalized care, monitor and manage chronic conditions, and provide wellness services. But they are not physicians. They receive less education and specialized training as compared with physician-certified specialists like cardiologists, oncologists, nephrologists, or neurologists. I suspect that the reason for expanding categories of eligible lethal Read More ›

The creation of the modern hospice movement was a major advance in the care for people with terminal illnesses. Alas, in recent years, hospice has entered something of a crisis, with too many facilities offering inadequate care and some patients receiving short shrift of services to which they are entitled. To get to the bottom of the problem, Wesley invited Read More ›